
![]()
Course Description/ Objectives
Course Activities/ Organization
Instructor Contact/ Office Hours
![]()
EDA 391F is a capstone doctoral seminar for students nearing the end of the coursework phase of their program. Following instructor guidance, students registered for the seminar share responsibility for class preparation, presentation and discussion of issue topics. Seminar issue topics are to include subjects not covered in depth in Higher Education Administration courses already taken or subjects students wish to explore in greater depth than provided in the collective curricular or internship experiences of students enrolled for the course. The issue topic product is also intended to measure a student's breadth of understanding about higher education administration, thereby meeting the Higher Education Specialization Qualifying Exam (SQE) requirement.
Additional anticipated outcomes include:
COURSE ACTIVITIES/ORGANIZATION
In a seminar setting and utilizing the knowledge and experience of class members and the instructor(s), the focus of the course will be on shared and self-learning both in the classroom and through electronic media. The class will utilize TeachNet, a Web-based system for sharing information used by the faculty, staff and students of the University of Texas at Austin College of Education. Training will be given during the first class on how to use this technology.
Active participation in class meetings and via electronic communication through TeachNet is essential to successful completion of the course. The preparation for such participation and the quality of participation each week will constitute a major portion of the final grade assessment for each enrolled class member.
A student is expected to have an issue topic approved by the Seminar Instructor prior to the start of the semester. The issue topic is to be current and sufficient to permit the student to demonstrate breadth of understanding of Higher Education Administration in accordance with SQE guidelines (See Specialization Qualification Examination policy statement, Revised October 2000 <edadmin.edb.utexas.edu/hed/sqeOct2000.htm>). The instructor may make final adjustments to issue topics after topic selection by all students in order to ensure the maximum shared learning from the seminar experience and minimal duplication of topic(s) by seminar participants.
This seminar (course) will be graded on a letter grade basis while the "issue project" will be graded on a "High Pass", "Pass" or "No Pass" basis as has been the tradition for the SQE. A "No Pass", may result the student being required to redo the "issue project" or meet other appropriate expectations for the SQE.
| Activity Points | (%) |
| Preparation/Participation* (in class and via TeachNet) (Includes written exercises and critique/review of peer products) |
50 |
| Term Project (Interactive Postings and Digital Submission) | 30 |
| Seminar ("teaching"/"oral exam") | 15 |
| Discussant Evaluation | 5 |
* Instructor evaluation regarding preparation/participation is obviously somewhat subjective and will be based on observations/judgments made during general class discussion, review of interactive exercises and written or TeachNet assignments. These include each student's input to and critique offered to peer postings at all stages starting with development and refinement of the issue topic. Thus, it is incumbent on all class members to post issue components on schedule and read/review and provide timely constructive critique to peer postings.
At the conclusion of the course students will be expected to evaluate the course and the instructor using the University's Course Instructor Survey and to provide additional commentary to guide future course enhancements. The use of technology as a tool for teaching will also be evaluated.
ACADEMIC ACCOMMODATIONS
The University of Texas provides, upon request, appropriate academic accommodations from qualified students with disabilities. For information, contact the Office of the Dean of Students at 471-6259 or 471-4641.
Students are expected to be above reproach in scholastic activities. Students who violate University rules on scholastic dishonesty are subject to disciplinary penalties, including the possibility of failure in the course and dismissal from the University. "Scholastic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, cheating, plagiarism, collusion, the submission for credit of any work or materials that are attributable in whole or in part to another person, taking an exam for another person, any act designed to give unfair advantage to a student or the attempt to commit such acts." (Regent's Rules and Regulations, Part One, Chapter VI, Section 3, Subsection 3.2, Subdivision 3.22.) Since scholastic dishonesty harms the individual, all students, and the integrity of the University, policies on scholastic dishonesty will be strictly enforced.
Students are strongly encouraged to avoid Incompletes. However, the Instructor will work with students who for a specific and valid reason find they cannot finish an assignment on time. However, out of respect for students who do complete their assignments on time, a student should expect that, under normal circumstances, the grade for work submitted late will be less than for the same work submitted on time. All work is to be completed by the end of the semester (i.e. an incomplete will be acceptable only under unusual circumstances).
INSTRUCTOR CONTACT/OFFICE HOURS
Instructor |
Dr. William F. Lasher |
Offices: |
SZB 374D |
Office Hours: |
By appointment |
Email: |
|
Fax: |
(512) 471-8590 |
Telephone: |
(512) 475-8586 |
Higher Education Faculty Assisting: |
Dr. James P. Duncan j.duncan@mail.utexas.edu Dr. Marilyn Kameen mkameen@mail.utexas.edu Dr. Edwin R. Sharpe esharpe@mail.utexas.edu Dr. Patricia A. Somers pasomers@mail.utexas.edu |
Class meetings will be held at the posted class meeting time/place. Interactive phases via TeachNet will not involve formal class meetings. However, the Activity Postings and Peer Critiques are to be made not later than (NLT) the posted class time on the due date.
Date/Activity |
Assignments |
January 18: Class Meeting |
Orientation Seminar Expectations Technology Training Using TeachNet (LTC Staff Member) Discussion Guidelines Peer Critique for the Draft SQE |
NLT January 25: Activity Posting |
Abstract & Comments |
NLT February 1: Peer Critique |
Peer critique; Instructor critique Expectation: Critique all Abstracts |
NLT Feburary 8: Activity Posting |
Detailed Outline + Bibliography |
NLT February 15: Peer Critique |
Detailed Outline + Bibliography; Peer critique & suggestions; Instructor critique & suggestions Expectation: Critique minimum of 3 (student's choice) |
NLT March 8: Activity Posting |
First Draft |
| March 13 - 17: | Spring Break |
March 22: Class Meeting |
Mid Semester Seminar Course Refinement/Adjustments Preparation for Concluding Seminar Requirement |
NLT March 29: Peer Critique |
First Draft Peer critique; Instructor review, comment (content, structure, organization/style, writing, critical thinking) Expectation: Critique 2 drafts (selections to be solicited/determined prior to posting deadline) |
NLT April 19: Activity Posting |
Final Draft |
April 26: Class Meeting |
Concluding Seminar Presentations with Discussants |
May 3: Class Meeting |
Concluding Seminar Presentations with Discussants Course Evaluation |
May 5: (Last day of classes) |
Final Report/Paper Posted |
NOTE: This site will look far better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.
We strongly encourage you or your system administrator to upgrade and take advantage of these free technologies. Here are the Web sites of some common browsers: Internet Explorer, Mozilla, Netscape, Safari (Mac OS X only).