The University of Texas at Austin

EDA 391F
Seminar: Policy Issues in Higher Education*
09190
Spring 2006

 COURSE SYLLABUS

 

COURSE DESCRIPTION/OBJECTIVES

EDA 391F is a capstone doctoral seminar for students nearing the end of the coursework phase of their program. Following instructor guidance, students registered for the seminar share responsibility for class preparation, presentation and discussion of issue topics. Seminar issue topics are to include subjects not covered in depth in Higher Education Administration courses already taken or subjects students wish to explore in greater depth than provided in the collective curricular or internship experiences of students enrolled for the course. The issue topic product is also intended to measure a student's breadth of understanding about higher education administration, thereby meeting the Higher Education Specialization Qualifying Exam (SQE) requirement.

Additional anticipated outcomes include:

  • Providing added depth to all students involved in the seminar through the combined (collective/shared) student learning experiences;
  • Providing a practice "teaching" experience and an "oral exam" component through preparation, presentation and guidance of seminar discussion of a selected higher education issue

 

COURSE ACTIVITIES/ORGANIZATION

In a seminar setting and utilizing the knowledge and experience of class members and the instructor(s), the focus of the course will be on shared and self-learning both in the classroom and through electronic media. The class will utilize TeachNet, a Web-based system for sharing information used by the faculty, staff and students of the University of Texas at Austin College of Education. Training will be given during the first class on how to use this technology.

Active participation in class meetings and via electronic communication through TeachNet is essential to successful completion of the course. The preparation for such participation and the quality of participation each week will constitute a major portion of the final grade assessment for each enrolled class member.

A student is expected to have an issue topic approved by the Seminar Instructor prior to the start of the semester. The issue topic is to be current and sufficient to permit the student to demonstrate breadth of understanding of Higher Education Administration in accordance with SQE guidelines (See Specialization Qualification Examination policy statement, Revised October 2000 <edadmin.edb.utexas.edu/hed/sqeOct2000.htm>). The instructor may make final adjustments to issue topics after topic selection by all students in order to ensure the maximum shared learning from the seminar experience and minimal duplication of topic(s) by seminar participants.

 

REQUIREMENTS

  1. Weekly preparation and participation both in the classroom and through electronic media are critical components and requirements of this course.
  2. Regular written exercises posted on TeachNet will be used to help sharpen individual analysis and critique of issues and to provide experience in developing effective responses to peer issue projects. Instructor critique of these exercises will constitute part of the final grade assessment for the course and in making judgments about the quality of weekly preparation and participation.
  3. A final term paper developed in stages and with peer and faculty interactive assistance. Successful completion of the final paper will, in most caes, meet the requirements for the Specialization Qualifying Exam (SQE). In the SQE, the student is expected to demonstrate a breadth of understanding about Higher Education Administration (with particular focus on history/philosophy, organization/administration, law and finance), to describe how areas interrelate, and to synthesize materials learned from a variety of disciplines and viewpoints (See Specialization Qualification Exam policy statement, Revised October 2000 <edadmin.edb.utexas.edu/hed/sqeOct2000.htm>). The final paper (exclusive of bibliography and appendices, if any) should not exceed 30 pages and shorter papers of quality are encouraged (e.g. 20-25 pages). In summary, the final written project (a problem solving exercise) is to be a tightly organized and well supported analysis of a higher education issue demonstrating at a minimum, the author's breadth of understanding of higher education dimensions enumerated above. The actual format for each issue analysis paper will be dependent on the issue under examination and how the author can best demonstrate breadth of understanding of higher education using the selected issue.
  4. Seminar. Each student is expected to lead a seminar with the class and visiting faculty members in the last two (2) or three (3) class sessions. This is a "practice teaching" and an "oral exam" experience with the student responsible for leading an interactive seminar covering the topic of the issue paper. It is not to be a summary of the "posted" final paper. All members of the class will have participated in all stages of the paper preparation and will have read the final draft. Thus, this is to be a seminar that takes the issue to the next level and could even lead to adjustments in the paper before final submission.
  5. Each student will be expected to serve as a discussant of another student's seminar. The discussant will provide evaluative comments, critique and suggestions in a fashion similar to what is done in many professional society contributed paper sessions.


STUDENT ASSESSMENT (GRADING)

This seminar (course) will be graded on a letter grade basis while the "issue project" will be graded on a "High Pass", "Pass" or "No Pass" basis as has been the tradition for the SQE. A "No Pass", may result the student being required to redo the "issue project" or meet other appropriate expectations for the SQE.

 

Activity Points
(%)
Preparation/Participation* (in class and via TeachNet)
(Includes written exercises and critique/review of peer products)
50
Term Project (Interactive Postings and Digital Submission)
30
Seminar ("teaching"/"oral exam")
15
Discussant Evaluation
5

 

* Instructor evaluation regarding preparation/participation is obviously somewhat subjective and will be based on observations/judgments made during general class discussion, review of interactive exercises and written or TeachNet assignments. These include each student's input to and critique offered to peer postings at all stages starting with development and refinement of the issue topic. Thus, it is incumbent on all class members to post issue components on schedule and read/review and provide timely constructive critique to peer postings.

 

COURSE EVALUATION

At the conclusion of the course students will be expected to evaluate the course and the instructor using the University's Course Instructor Survey and to provide additional commentary to guide future course enhancements. The use of technology as a tool for teaching will also be evaluated.

 

ACADEMIC ACCOMMODATIONS

The University of Texas provides, upon request, appropriate academic accommodations from qualified students with disabilities. For information, contact the Office of the Dean of Students at 471-6259 or 471-4641.

 

SCHOLASTIC DISHONESTY

Students are expected to be above reproach in scholastic activities. Students who violate University rules on scholastic dishonesty are subject to disciplinary penalties, including the possibility of failure in the course and dismissal from the University. "Scholastic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, cheating, plagiarism, collusion, the submission for credit of any work or materials that are attributable in whole or in part to another person, taking an exam for another person, any act designed to give unfair advantage to a student or the attempt to commit such acts." (Regent's Rules and Regulations, Part One, Chapter VI, Section 3, Subsection 3.2, Subdivision 3.22.) Since scholastic dishonesty harms the individual, all students, and the integrity of the University, policies on scholastic dishonesty will be strictly enforced. 

 

INCOMPLETE GRADE

Students are strongly encouraged to avoid Incompletes. However, the Instructor will work with students who for a specific and valid reason find they cannot finish an assignment on time. However, out of respect for students who do complete their assignments on time, a student should expect that, under normal circumstances, the grade for work submitted late will be less than for the same work submitted on time. All work is to be completed by the end of the semester (i.e. an incomplete will be acceptable only under unusual circumstances).

 

INSTRUCTOR CONTACT/OFFICE HOURS

Instructor
Dr. William F. Lasher
Offices:
SZB 374D
Office Hours:
By appointment
Email:
Fax:
(512) 471-8590
Telephone:
(512) 475-8586
Higher Education
Faculty Assisting:
Dr. James P. Duncan j.duncan@mail.utexas.edu
Dr. Marilyn Kameen mkameen@mail.utexas.edu
Dr. Edwin R. Sharpe esharpe@mail.utexas.edu
Dr. Patricia A. Somers pasomers@mail.utexas.edu

 

 

 

COURSE OUTLINE/SCHEDULE

Class meetings will be held at the posted class meeting time/place. Interactive phases via TeachNet will not involve formal class meetings. However, the Activity Postings and Peer Critiques are to be made not later than (NLT) the posted class time on the due date.

 

Date/Activity
Assignments
January 18:
Class Meeting
Orientation
Seminar Expectations
Technology Training Using TeachNet (LTC Staff Member)
Discussion Guidelines
Peer Critique for the Draft SQE
NLT January 25:
Activity Posting
Abstract & Comments
NLT February 1:
Peer Critique
Peer critique; Instructor critique
Expectation: Critique all Abstracts
NLT Feburary 8:
Activity Posting
Detailed Outline + Bibliography

NLT February 15:
Peer Critique
Detailed Outline + Bibliography; Peer critique & suggestions; Instructor critique & suggestions
Expectation: Critique minimum of 3 (student's choice)
NLT March 8:
Activity Posting
First Draft
March 13 - 17: Spring Break
March 22:
Class Meeting
Mid Semester Seminar
Course Refinement/Adjustments
Preparation for Concluding Seminar Requirement
NLT March 29:
Peer Critique
First Draft
Peer critique; Instructor review, comment
(content, structure, organization/style, writing, critical thinking)
Expectation: Critique 2 drafts (selections to be solicited/determined prior to posting deadline)
NLT April 19:
Activity Posting
Final Draft
April 26:
Class Meeting
Concluding Seminar Presentations with Discussants
May 3:
Class Meeting
Concluding Seminar Presentations with Discussants
Course Evaluation
May 5:
(Last day of classes)
Final Report/Paper Posted

 

NOTE: This site will look far better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

We strongly encourage you or your system administrator to upgrade and take advantage of these free technologies. Here are the Web sites of some common browsers: Internet Explorer, Mozilla, Netscape, Safari (Mac OS X only).